In order to purchase an iPhone in the USA you need to sign up for a 2 year contract with a cellular phone vendor. That seems like a relatively fair deal: Apple gets their money, the cell phone vendor gets their money, and you get an iPhone. Part of the deal is that the phone is locked to this particular cell phone vendor; this means that if you want to put a SIM card in the phone and actually make calls with it, then it will only work with this one vendor. This seems unfair but it is still acceptable; Apple makes the rules and we play by them. There is one more catch, though; the only way that you can ever upgrade the software on your iPhone is if you have an active SIM card with the cell phone vendor.
The implication here is that if you want to keep using your iPhone past the two year contract, where using it means keeping it up to date with the most current operating system, then you must continue your contract with said cell phone vendor! This is unacceptable. You might wonder why you would bother to keep using your iPhone after the contract expires, and you should. Well there are two very good reasons:
- You bought a new model if iPhone and you want to use your old one for music only (or perhaps your spouse/partner/children/friends want to use it).
- You are using your old phone for development purposes.
Ideally, the iPhone device would function like most other computers and allow you to install future software updates on them without interference. Even if it were locked down to Apple software only that would be totally acceptable. The current model really makes me cringe when I think about the money you would have to waste just to use a 2 year old device; I guess this explains why so many old iPhones are always up for sale on the sales boards. One other thing to note, if said cell phone vendor is teleported off of the Earth by aliens, then you are left with a multi-thousand dollar cell phone that will not work; since it only works with said vendor. Of course, Apple would have to deal with this, but what if Apple is teleported off of the Earth? Again, you are left with a useless multi-thousand dollar cell phone that will not work. What a rip off.
The reason why the iPhone can be a hard sell is that despite the fact that they are selling it; you can never really buy it. It is really a leased device; if you want to maintain it you need a cell phone contract. Fortunately for us there is an amazing device that is just as powerful; the iPod Touch!
Note: People report that you can “activate” your phone using any active SIM car from said vendor; but this is not stated anywhere officially and can’t be counted on in the future.
Note: Here is an excerpt from a conversation I had with the cell phone vendor’s support where I was trying to learn more about how the iPhone works with them.
Grant: If AT&T goes out of business, I would be left with a cell phone that I could not use right? Rhonda: Apple and [vendor] have an agreement to have [vendor] be the exclusive carrier for their device. If something should happen to [vendor] and we no longer provide service, I am sure that Apple would move the devices to a carrier who would. I can not see that happening but I am sure it would be worked out. Grant: What if Apple goes out of business? Rhonda: Currently the iPhone is programmed for use with [vendor]. The iPhone software is updated and maintained thru iTunes so I would not be concerned about having a device that couldn't be used. --- Grant: Re #3, I am confused about what it means to use and activate and update the device and stuff. Rhonda: The iPhone does not function without Active service.
4 thoughts on “Why the iPhone Can Be a Hard Sell”
Hi Grant, This is just one more example of Apple’s restrictive practices. I will not buy or develop for the iPhone because of their closed and restrictive policies. Firstly I can only develop on a Mac even though the toolchain would easily compile for Linux. This means that I would have buy a Mac (at a cost of GBP1000 for a machine worth around GBP400) unnecessarily lining Apple’s pockets. Then I would not be able to distribute my software unless via the iStore and then only with Apple’s blessing so they can ensure that it has no way to download any other executable content ! Sorry Apple but it’s not acceptable if I buy a device – I’ll decide what software I run on it not you.
Instead I bought a Nokia N810 which runs a lovely, completely open, Linux distro called Maemo. It took me 10 minutes to compile an existing Scheme interpreter, tinyscheme, for it and install it on there. There’s probably enough resources to run something like Gambit on there so I could try that at some point.
Nokia are about to release some serious iPhone contenters based on Maemo – good luck to them I say. It’s about time Apple’s restrictive monopoly was challenged.
Thanks for posting about the N series. Having looked at the N8xx, I loved its potential but was disappointed that it was not a phone. Now I see that the N900 is going to change all of that; it looks like a powerhouse!
My favorite handheld was my Psion 5mx; sadly time has moved forward but it has not.
The iPhone form factor and user interface is so compelling. It just begs people to pick it up and touch it. That draw is hard to resist; and despite the obvious lock-in as you pointed out, it is hard to resist from the perspective of providing a pleasant user-experience to how many millions of users out there. For me, the iPod Touch is an acceptable compromise, for the sake of the users if no one else.
I have an original iPhone as well as a 3G. The original-generation iPhone, which is no longer activated, accepts firmware upgrades and functions perfectly for any functionality that does not require a cellular network connection; in other words, it’s essentially identical to an iPod Touch of the same vintage, except with a microphone.
For what it’s worth.
Thanks for sharing that. What I found so disappointing was that you can not (at least according to said vendor’s support staff along with what I could find out on the Internet) do so with a 3GS, ever.